Security Policy

I need support with this Computer Science question so I can learn better.

Case Study: Security Policy

Review the Technology Use Policy for Strayer University and the Information Security Policies for Strayer University, The George Washington University, and Harvard University:

Note: Include two (2) other websites published within the past [1] year in your references section. These two (2) websites do not count towards the required number of references.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Explain the purpose of a university security policy and indicate the major reasons why they are necessary. Provide your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy
  2. Critique the level of completeness of the Strayer University Security Policy
  3. Critique the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy
  4. Suggest one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Provide a rationale for your response
  5. Use at least four (4) quality references published within the past [1] year in this assignment.
    Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA. Check with your professor for any additional instructions
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Examine the challenges of computer security, including different threats and types of attacks
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in cryptography
  • Write clearly and concisely about cryptography using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 110

Case Study 2:Security Policy

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Explain the purpose of a university security policy and indicate the major reasons why they are necessary. Provide your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely explained the purpose of a university security policy and did not submit or incompletely indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Did not submit or incompletely provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

Partially explained the purpose of a university security policy and partially indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Partially provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

Satisfactorily explained the purpose of a university security policy and satisfactorily indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Satisfactorily provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

Thoroughly explained the purpose of a university security policy and thoroughly indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Thoroughly provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

2. Critique the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

Partially critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

Satisfactorily critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

Thoroughly critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

3. Critique the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

Partially critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

Satisfactorily critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

Thoroughly critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

4. Suggest one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

5. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Get 20% discount on your first order with us. Place an order and use coupon: GET20

Posted in Uncategorized