Rhetorical Analysis Essay revise rough draft

I’m studying for my English class and need an explanation.

By the due date assigned, submit your revised Rhetorical Analysis Essay in the Submissions Area.

Revise the rough draft you posted in the W1 Assignment 3, based on feedback you received from your instructor and peers.

Proofread your work carefully, ensuring that your in-text citations and references page entries conform to APA style and that your headers and cover page, as well as the rest of your document, are formatted correctly. Use the APA Citation Helper or the APA Citations Quick Sheet to help with your in-text citations and references.


For this assignment, you will write a rough draft of a rhetorical analysis essay and submit it to the Discussion Area. After you post your rough draft, you will provide feedback to two peers using the discussion participation questions below.

Step 1:

Read “How the Future Will Judge Us,” by Kwame Anthony Appiah, in our text, Read, Reason, Write.


Appiah, K. A. (2019). How the future will judge us. In D. U. Seyler & A. Brizee (Eds.) Read, Reason, Write: An Argument Text and Reader (pp. 511-513). New York: McGraw Hill.

Use the APA Citation Helper or the APA Citations Quick Sheet for help to correctly cite the article.


How will The Future Judge Us

A century ago, when a man Punished his wife and his children with corporal punishment, it was regarded as a father’s duty. Homosexuality and abortion were unacceptable and carried harsh sentences such as hanging. Slavery was allowed because the white people considered the African black individuals as second class citizens and personal property. Analyzing such practices today, one question that people will ask is how their forefathers could have allowed such atrocities or useless traditions to happen. Surprisingly, chances are that our own descendants will also ask the same question when they examine some of the practices being undertaken today. In the book titled, How the Future will Judge Us, Kwame Appiah discusses current social practices, such as industrial meat production, institutionalization, environmental degradation, and isolation of the elderly, and failure of the current prison system, which he believes are wrong and are out of place. Kwame indicates that just like we are quick to question and disregard most practices and values that were practiced in the past, the future generation will also question some of the common practices we highly value today.

On the issue of the American prison system, Kwame argues that the current society believes that crime can reduce by locking people behind bars. The prison system is just but a massive waste of individuals’ lives. Prison life is morally troubling such that those who support the current prison system and its conditions often do so either because of ignorance or in non-moral terms. On the topic of industrial meat production, Kwame questions the moral perception of whether animals can also suffer. He argues that those who eat factory-farmed bacon or chicken rarely provide substantial moral justification for such actions. On the issue of isolation of the elderly, Kwame questions why Americans normalized the tendency to keep their elderly parents in an elderly home where a majority of them are isolated and often lack the family love.

One interesting aspect about Kwame in his book is the use of pathos, emotional appeal, to capture the attention of the reader by swaying their emotions to make them agree with his analogies and his perspective on the critical topics his addresses. In order to capture the emotions of the reader, Kwame uses two key techniques. First, he uses statistics to make the reader agree with his argument. Kwame shows the irony between the American population and its prison system by arguing that the US has 4% of the world’s population, but 25% of its prisoners (Appiah, 2019). By being emotionally swayed by these statistics, the reader will question how a country with just 4 percent of the world’s population can contribute to 25% of the total number of prisoners across the globe. Secondly, Kwame uses personal experiences as a technique of emotionally appealing to the reader. On the topic of isolation of the elderly in America, Kwame gives a personal experience of how it was so nice and satisfying for his aging mother to live with his children during her last days. Kwame goes ahead and asks if the practice of isolating the elderly population is what western modernity amounts to. By giving such personal experience, Kwame makes the reader question how American society has lost the feel and obligation of caring for their inconvenient elders.

There is no doubt that if people can look back at a century ago, majority of them will end up questioning so many issues. Ironically, the future generation will also question some of the practices we hold today. Kwame Appiah achieves his objective of emotionally appealing and swaying the reader not to only question the past but also the present. In conclusion, by addressing critical issues such as the increasing rate of incarcerations, the rapid environmental degradation, the continued isolation of the elderly, and the industrial production of meat, Kwame achieves to remind the reader to think of the future to make the world a better place for tomorrow’s generation.


Appiah, K. A. (2019). How the future will judge us. In D. U. Seyler & A. Brizee (Eds.) Read, Reason, Write: An Argument Text and Reader (pp. 511-513). New York: McGraw Hill.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Posted in Uncategorized