need a paper regarding failure mode effects and criticality analysis fmeca

The deliverable for this assignment is a 2-3 page paper and a completed FMEA. First, identify a common operational challenge (such as Emergency Room waiting time, Operating Room turn-over, timely patient discharge) in healthcare organizations and use the FMECA tool to identify potential failure modes. Then, for the top three modes, develop 2-3 tactics to prevent the failure.

The paper should be well-written and meet the following requirements:

HCM410 Mod 3 CT

HCM410 Mod 3 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Requirements

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Content

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the FMEA or FFA tool; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Critical Analysis

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis of the relevant operational issues.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis of the relevant operational issues.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis of the relevant operational issues.

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis of the relevant operational issues.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Sources/ Examples

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Demonstrates proper use of APA style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Get 20% discount on your first order with us. Place an order and use coupon: GET20

Posted in Uncategorized